Skip to main content

LASIK Preferred to Contact Lenses Over Time

  • Home
  • >
  • LASIK
  • >
  • LASIK Preferred to Contact Lenses Over Time

LASIK Preferred to Contact Lenses Over Time

Posted By: Dr. Jay Bansal
in

Latest Posts

Categories

About Author

Dr. Jay Bansal, LaserVue Eye Center medical director

Dr. Jay Bansal

With decades of expertise, Dr. Jay Bansal uses his blog, Ophthalmologist Explains, to shed light on vision care and advancements in vision correction treatments.

About Author

Dr. Bansal Headshot 7.jpg

Written By:

With decades of expertise, Dr. Jay Bansal uses his blog, Ophthalmologist Explains, to shed light on vision care and advancements in vision correction treatments. More About Jay Bansal, MD >>>

Contact-Lens

Why is LASIK Now Preferred to Contact Lenses?

A new study found that contact lens users who chose to have LASIK were more satisfied with their vision a year after the surgery, and even more satisfied after two and even three years, according to the study conducted by the Cornea Research Foundation of America. Contact lens users were found to have decreasing levels of satisfaction over time.

The study is the first to directly compare satisfaction rates of contact lens wearers with those who opt for LASIK.

Some key findings comparing LASIK to Contact Lenses include:

  • Contact lens satisfaction declined over time- LASIK did not.
  • LASIK reduced night driving difficulties among former contact lens wearers
  • Those who opted for LASIK reported less issues such as eye infections and abrasions

The proportion expressing strong satisfaction with contact lenses decreased from 63% at the start of the study to 54% at year three. Conversely, 88% of former contact lens users and 77% of former spectacle users reported being strongly satisfied with LASIK at year three, consistent with the high satisfaction levels at years one and two.

Sources:

Price, Marianne O. et al. (August, 2016). Three-Year Longitudinal Survey Comparing Visual Satisfaction with LASIK and Contact Lenses. Ophthalmology, Volume 123 (8), pages 1659 – 1666.* Retrieved from www.aaojournal.org